I. 英文原版
Professor Susannah Scott, Ph.D., at the University of California, Santa Barbara and Associate editor of ACS Catalysis says it’s simple. “Usually I just start writing,” she says, “I think its important to get stuff down.” Scott says to place emphasis primarily on the content and then organize it later. Simply writing the title and abstract and return to revise them as needed. This helps you condense your message which will allow you to frame the message you want to convey. The results and interpretation can be added after this is done.
Professor Chad Mirkin, Ph.D., Director of the International Institute for Nanotechology and the George B. Rathmann Professor of Chemistry at Northwestern University, and Associate Editor of Journal of the American Chemical Society says to start with the most important conclusions you can draw from your research. “Don’t write an introduction that sets up the reader for disappointment,” Mirkin adds, “make sure the science backs up what you’re stating.” Once you have that, the difficult part is over. The intro tells the reader what problem is being solved, the data presents the argument, and all that is left is the conclusion.
Olaf G. Weist, Ph.D., Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Notre Dame breaks researchers into two groups—those that think graphically, and those that focus on words. For the graphic thinkers, Weist recommends that they start with the figures. These figures will dictate what to highlight in your paper. Word-oriented researchers should make flash cards with topics to organize. This way they can add and eliminate topics.
Professor Johnathan V. Sweedler, Ph.D., James R. Eiszner Family Endowed Chair in Chemistry and Director, School of Chemical Sciences, University of Illinois, and Editor-in-Chief of Analytical Chemistry reinforces that writing takes practice.
Getting feedback and improving is key to proficiency.
Simply beginning to write is the first step to getting started. From there, it only gets easier. If you’re unable to start with words, start with figures and use those to help you find your words.
II. 中文版
开始任何类型的论文都是困难的，但科学论文伴随着独特的挑战。
加州大学圣巴巴拉分校的Susannah Scott教授和ACS Catalysis的副主编说这很简单。“通常我只是开始写作，”她说，“我认为把东西写下来很重要。斯科特说，首先要强调内容，然后再组织。只需写下标题和摘要，然后根据需要返回进行修改。这有助于您压缩信息，从而使您能够构建要传达的信息。完成此操作后，可以添加结果和解释。
国际纳米技术研究所所长、西北大学乔治·B·拉斯曼化学教授、《美国化学学会杂志》副主编Chad Mirkin教授博士说，从研究中可以得出的最重要的结论开始。“不要写一个让读者失望的介绍，”米尔金补充道，“确保科学支持你所说的。一旦你有了它，困难的部分就结束了。介绍告诉读者正在解决什么问题，数据提出论点，剩下的就是结论。
圣母大学化学和生物化学教授Olaf G. Weist博士将研究人员分为两组 – 一组以图形方式思考，另一组专注于文字。对于图形思想家，Weist建议他们从数字开始。这些数字将决定在您的论文中突出显示的内容。以文字为导向的研究人员应该制作带有组织主题的抽认卡。这样，他们可以添加和消除主题。
Johnathan V. Sweedler教授博士，James R. Eiszner家族化学主席，伊利诺伊大学化学科学学院院长，分析化学主编，强调写作需要实践。
获得反馈和改进是熟练掌握的关键。
简单地开始写作是开始的第一步。从那里开始，它只会变得更容易。如果您无法从单词开始，请从数字开始，然后使用这些数字来帮助您找到单词。